Advertisement
all of the returns are posted...check them out in the gallery.
posted by:
|
Indiana
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
-
Re: bw postcards
Mon, September 27, 2004 - 6:35 PMi guess that means you saw something you liked? -
-
Re: bw postcards
Mon, September 27, 2004 - 7:18 PMyeah, my stuff! #33 and #66 -
-
Re: bw postcards
Tue, September 28, 2004 - 7:59 PMmight i suggest that when you scan the postcards in you make them about half the size they are currently, so that when you look at them individually you can see the whole postcard in the browser window...
what dpi are you scanning them in at?
i would suggest 72dpi as the web only goes up to 72 dots per inch anyway.
... but perhaps you have a reason for them being so large.
~ajax -
-
Re: bw postcards
Wed, September 29, 2004 - 2:35 PMOoh ooh! I agree, only because I want to be able to see everyone's stuff.
P.S. I totally understand that it's a pain to take the images down, resize them, and then put them back up. -
-
Re: bw postcards
Thu, September 30, 2004 - 3:01 PMI like the large scans---that means we can grab them and reduce them if we need to.
Nothing sucks more than finding a nice, crisp photo a work you created and no longer have, only to find that it has a crappy little web-restricted resolution!
Plus, I am teh l33ch, and steal all images! bwah-ha-hah! -
-
Re: bw postcards
Tue, October 5, 2004 - 6:56 PMi didnt realize that they sucked...i cant rescan too much time...ill check into making then smaller ..i dont have that problem. -
-
Re: bw postcards
Tue, October 5, 2004 - 10:51 PMno no, they don't suck. I just have a laptop with a small screen.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
